Connect with us


Controversial Call Sparks Social Media Debate

Controversial Call Sparks Social Media Debate

By Erik Gudris|Thursday, June 10, 2021

The awesome end to the Barbora Krejcikova and also Maria Sakkari females’s semifinal at Roland Garros was nearly tainted by what become a wrong judgment by the umpire.

Though it really did not always alter the result of the suit, it did reignite the debate on if clay court events ought to utilize digital line testimonial.

Much More: Krejcikova Conserves Suit Information, Gets To RG Final

Late in the last collection, Krejcikova held a 4th suit factor leading 8-7 in the last collection. Throughout the rally, Sakkari’s shot landed near to the standard. When the linesperson called it “out”, Krejcikova began commemorating what she believed was the win.

Yet, the umpire, examining the mark, stated Sakkari’s shot as“in” The factor was repeated with Sakkari winning it later on, sending out the video game to deuce.

Unofficial review, used only in television, showed that Sakkari’s shot was indeed out. However, Krejcikova eventually went on to win 7-5, 4-6, 9-7 to reach her first major final.

When asked about the call, Krejcikova herself did not think it impacted the outcome of the match.

“At that moment I was just like, Well, it’s out, but what can you do?” Krejcikova said. “The chair umpire, he has seen it as in. What can I do? I cannot do anything about it. I cannot call anyone, change his decision.

“I was like, Okay, well, it’s fine. Doesn’t matter. Just let’s go. Because it was replay the point, just let’s try to win the next one. I kind of, like, got relieved that it’s over. They called it. He came. He’s like, No, it’s in. I’m like, No, no, no.”

“You just have to put everything together and just keep working, next one, next one, next one. I mean, as I said on the court, even if I lost this match, I think I just wasn’t able to do anything different, anything more. I would be still very proud of myself, what I actually did, how I played.”

The call, and lack of official review, inspired many players and commentators to weigh in on the subject.

“I almost wonder if he (the umpire) got the wrong mark there,” Lindsay Davenport on Tennis Channel said, especially as the ball mark was 19 millimeters from the line.

“The court is so chewed up, we’re at the tail end of the deciding set, we’ve played 15 and some games here, so it is very, very difficult,” Jason Goodall added.

While the other Grand Slams (Australian Open, US Open and Wimbledon) employ some kind of electronic line call review system, Roland Garros does not.

Largely due to officials being able to see a mark on the surface, and the discrepancies such marks cause with the technology, electronic reviews are not always 100 percent accurate on clay.


There’s no warranty that note revealed by Hawkeye was right as it hasn’t passed the precision examination in tests on clay. It’s why it is not made use of. It unsafe to utilize Hawkeye to replay sphere marks on clay (for TELEVISION) when it’s not trustworthy sufficient yet for suit play. Simply my viewpoint.

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

More in Tennis

We would like to show you notifications for the latest news and updates.
Allow Notifications